Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management
Fund control for MAM clients & managed account.
The most reasonable method for capital control in forex investment is to buy historical bottoms and sell historical tops, or to buy period bottoms and sell period tops, with a maximum leverage of less than 3 times; after the trend retracement, when re-extending, use a maximum leverage of less than 2 times. When reaching the historical bottom and historical top, or reaching the stage bottom and stage top, you should not use leverage or even not trade. The fund control method for multi-account management customers is similar, but different human factors are added. Conservative customers do not use leverage. Aggressive clients use leverage below 3 times.
Psychological control for MAM clients & managed account.
The psychological control of forex investment, after long-term investment and trading training, the psychological control experience: buying historical bottoms and selling historical tops must withstand floating losses, or buying stage bottoms and selling stage tops must withstand floating losses & deficit. After the trend stabilizes and the account continues to make profits, it must be able to withstand floating profits. Don't see small profits and forget about big gains, let alone see short-term small profits and forget about long-term accumulated big gains. The psychology of multi-account management customers is more complex. Some customers are short-sighted, seeing small profits and forgetting big gains, seeing short-term profits and forgetting long-term gains, and ending account custody early. This is not bad, the worst thing is that customers always interfere with you during the investment process, which is the most painful. Thousands of people have different views. If the funds are large enough, it is the safest and not to accept customer account custody, but it may never be a big investor.
The subtle differences in investment psychology between brokers and traders.
According to a statistical report, after collecting, filtering, and analyzing data on sex buyers near Wall Street, an important rule was found that the majority of sex buyers are fixed income brokers, that is those who earn fixed commission contracts or fixed spread income from platforms, investment banks, securities firms, etc. There are very few investment traders, who are self reliant, risk-taking, unpaid, and self employed independent investment traders. Think about it, people who can invest and trade on Wall Street, even investment traders within teams such as investment banks, institutions, sovereign wealth funds, etc. who have no fixed base salary and take risks, should have a sufficient amount of funds at their disposal. Not buying sex is not a scarcity of funds. The risk profession has changed their view of human nature, that is they have no sex, no interest in sex, sex no longer attracts the attention of investors, and human nature has been completely overturned. So for retail investors and traders with very limited funds, the change in sexual values should be greater, but there is no survey or statistical data released. In short: risk can change human nature, and without a sense of security, there is no sexual pleasure.
The psychological conflict between traders’ consumption and investment views.
Sewing and patching in life and spending money like soil in the stock market. This may be a very tangled, abnormal psychological feeling or even a psychological conflict among many stock investment traders. In fact, this is an occupational disease common among investment traders in fund management during the investment process. This is not a psychological abnormality or psychological conflict, but a normal psychological phenomenon among investors. Only by facing and understanding it can we accept, tolerate, and let go of it. Only by making the investment mentality healthier can we do better long-term investment tradings. Because the vast majority of traders are retail traders, this means that the vast majority of traders are small-capital traders, which also means that the vast majority of traders are traders who lack funds. As long as they have sufficient capital reserves, they will not be eliminated and will feel more secure. The savings they make in life are just to accumulate more capital for long-term investment, whereas consumption represents a real loss of their original capital. Consumption does not create the conditions for achieving financial freedom in the future, but saving does. Therefore, as long as they participate in investment and develop an investment concept, they may become stingier than their original selves without an investment concept. Sometimes they may even hate themself or even be confused about their consumption outlook. In fact, not only retail investors who are short of funds have this mentality, but also world-renowned big investors also have this subtle psychological conflict: when he makes a lot of money today, he eats a big hamburger, and when he loses a lot of money today, he eats a small hamburger. This is not a question of the size of the burger, nor is it a question of stinginess, but a method of psychological self-healing after a loss.
Conflict between investors and traders’ views on investment and marriage.
There are many men theirs spouses do not have jobs, and they rely on the men to support the family. If men are high earners, there will be no problem of psychological stress. If a man has an average income, he must be under a lot of pressure. Don't laugh at men's frugality. From a psychological point of view, it can be easily explained: the more frugal and stingy you are, the more secure you will be. Spend less and save a little, and the future will not be too hard. If a man with an average income also is a stock or futures investor, women may not understand such extraordinary pressure and fear. Only those women who have participated in stock investments can understand deeply, or experienced female gamblers can understand the psychological phenomenon: save money and make big bets. Perhaps many unmarried women or men may get involved in investments too early, which may affect their ability to get married, and might even lead them remaining unmarried and infertile throughout their lives. The biggest inequality in investment is the inequality of funds. Most young people are not born rich or noble. When they first enter society, their savings are very limited. They may have tried their best just to survive. If they want to rely on investment road to financial freedom is long, and marriage is considered an urgent and top priority for young people that requires a lot of money. When there is a conflict between marriage and investment, give priority to marriage and put aside ambitions for the time being. Plan the investment path in the long term, and do not miss marriage, otherwise they will only regret it when they are old.
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
Mr. Zhang
China · Guangzhou
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
Mr. Zhang
China · Guangzhou